Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Howard Salmon's avatar

Mike, this nails the pivot: attention is easy to buy, but attachment is durable—and the durable thing is what turns “assistant” into infrastructure.

What struck me is how little of this is about capability and how much is about interface psychology. A chatbot that answers is a tool; a desk object that reacts becomes a presence. Once you add gestures, gaze, nods—social cues we’re trained to read—you’re no longer competing on features. You’re competing on relationship.

The desk is the perfect placement, too. It’s repetition + proximity + routine—exactly the conditions that create habit. That also makes consent and privacy the load-bearing beams here: always-listening, always-looking, network-connected “workmates” don’t just help; they reshape what the workspace is.

If this category is coming, I’d love to see your take on what “ethical attachment” would require: explicit mode indicators, user-controlled personalities, local-first processing, and hard limits on persuasive behavior. Without that, the “friend” mask becomes a subscription funnel.

No posts

Ready for more?